Press Network of India

Blood Storage: Essential for Safer Care in Every Hospital

0 12

By Dr Sreeram

As a gynaecologist with over 30 years of dedicated service in Kerala’s healthcare landscape, I have spent decades managing obstetric emergencies, conducting thousands of deliveries, and performing complex surgeries where timely blood transfusion stands between life and death. In obstetric practice, postpartum haemorrhage remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide, and in Kerala too, it demands immediate, assured access to safe blood. Every hospital that undertakes surgeries or deliveries must have a functional blood bank or blood storage centre equipped for 24×7 cross-matching and compatibility testing. This is not a luxury or an enhancement—it is a fundamental medical imperative. Blood must be available before the patient enters the labour room or operation theatre. Without on-site assurance, even the most experienced hands cannot fully safeguard the patient.

Yet, Kerala’s infrastructure falls tragically short of this essential standard. The state currently operates around 180–195 licensed blood centres, with only about 40–42 in the government sector. This leaves less than one blood centre for every 30 of the approximately 5,402 private hospitals (as per recent Indian Medical Association data reflecting growth up to 2026). Most routine deliveries and surgeries occur in private and mid-sized facilities, where no blood bank exists due to prohibitive licensing requirements, infrastructure costs, and shortages of trained personnel.

Kerala sees roughly 3.2–3.5 lakh institutional deliveries annually (with near-universal institutional coverage), translating to about 900–1,000 births per day. The vast majority happen in settings lacking immediate blood support. National frameworks under the National Blood Policy (2002) and Drugs and Cosmetics Rules mandate safe, adequate, accessible blood supply, prioritising voluntary non-remunerated donation. Kerala’s State Transfusion Policy aligns with these goals—emphasising rational use, quality, equity, and voluntary donation—but implementation has stagnated amid rapid healthcare expansion. Stringent norms effectively bar smaller and mid-tier hospitals from setting up even basic storage centres, leaving routine obstetric and surgical sites exposed.

This structural deficit creates recurring crises: critical transfers to distant centres often end in “nil stock,” elective surgeries face indefinite delays, and emergencies compel families toward replacement donors or informal paid routes—practices banned by the Supreme Court in 1996 to curb infection risks. Clinicians shoulder the moral and legal weight of these gaps, documenting failures while prioritising lives.

Voluntary donations decline amid changing demographics and lifestyles. Distribution remains uneven, with rural and semi-urban areas underserved. No comprehensive statewide real-time digital inventory platform efficiently redirects surplus units. Existing hub-and-spoke models and blood storage centres at First Referral Units address only partial needs.

Immediate policy reform is essential to bridge this gap:

  1. Mandate licensed blood storage centres with 24×7 cross-matching in every hospital performing obstetric deliveries or surgeries (beyond 25 beds), supported by streamlined licensing, subsidies for equipment, and trained staffing.
  2. Establish component separation units in major centres with equitable statewide distribution.
  3. Deploy a robust, real-time digital blood inventory platform across Kerala to minimise waste and delays.
  4. Relax regulatory hurdles for hospital-attached blood banks while upholding national quality standards.
  5. Intensify year-round voluntary donation campaigns with incentives for repeat donors, targeting youth, workplaces, and institutions.
  6. Bolster enforcement against illegal paid donation by eliminating the root pressures driving it.

These steps directly build on the National Blood Policy and Kerala’s State Transfusion Policy. They demand only decisive political commitment and administrative action.

Kerala’s celebrated healthcare model is defined by patient outcomes, not infrastructure counts. Until every facility handling labour or surgery ensures on-site blood readiness, preventable losses persist. The blood must be in the refrigerator before the scalpel—or the decision to deliver—is made. Anything short is not progressive healthcare; it is institutionalised vulnerability.

Policy change is imperative now—to safeguard every mother, every surgical patient, and every life reliant on prompt transfusion in Kerala.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.